No end of school massacres and other slaughters have tallied horrific body counts because of military-grade weapons in the hands of mass murderers. And it is not the case that if assault weapons were banned ordinary people would get them anyway. Enough said about this loathsome idea. “Anyone who pretends there’s nothing we can do is lying — and holding that view should be disqualifying for anyone seeking to lead our country.” Keep supporting great journalism by turning off your ad blocker. Allowing easy access to assault weapons guarantees that terrorists, criminals and mentally unstable people will use them to commit future acts of mass murder -- it's that simple. Not all weapons must be considered suitable for private hands. We make it very hard for a terrorist to get nuclear weapons or dirty bomb. Assault rifles fire bullets with greater velocity and energy, leading to more serious wounds. Had he been armed with the pistol alone, he still would have killed people — but not so many. Attempting such a prohibition would also be obscene in a nation that enshrines religious freedom in the First Amendment. It’s Too Late to Ban Assault Weapons. We made it easy for you to exercise your right to vote. The Post’s View: Orlando mass shooting an ‘act of terror, act of hate’, The Post’s View: The gun debate America needs to have. The ban didn’t apply to guns in existence at the time it was enacted, and it contained a sunset provision allowed it to expire after ten years, in 2004, which is what happened. All I can say is I wish the author was in Russia or China or any of fifty other countries when the Communists and fascists took over, or even Nazi Germany when guns were taken. By all means, Congress should immediately ban gun sales to anyone on such a watch list. The Real Assault Weapon Is The Liberal Media.....Not Guns ( Six Reasons Why Assault Weapons Should Not Be Banned) User Name: Remember Me: Password : Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! It’s a … That’s because magazine size has nothing to do with lethality. There are seven billion people on the planet. If the answer is no, wave them through? If it insults the Constitution, so be it — any other response would do far greater harm to our freedoms. And after last week, can anyone seriously question whether assault weapons are in fact weapons of mass destruction? No hunter needs an AR-15 to bring down a deer. Here’s what you need to know about the gun some are calling “the gold standard for mass murder.” (Gillian Brockell/The Washington Post). the 2004 expiration of the assault weapons ban 697 vii. The federal government banned military-style semiautomatic assault weapons for 10 years between 1994 and 2004, and deaths from mass shootings fell. More often than not, criminals have access to the … Why in the world should we allow pretty much anyone to have easy access to assault weapons? By banning anyone from buying Stinger Missiles that are used to shoot down airplanes do we make it more likely that the government will one day prevent people from hunting ducks? In 2014, 660 people were murdered with what the FBI calls “personal weapons”–hands, fists, feet– compared to 248 with rifles. new york state’s post-sandy hook assault weapons ban 702 conclusion 707 appendix 710 use of assault weapons in mass shootings 710 introduction We Must Ban Assault Weapons Essay 2393 Words10 Pages The controversy over assault rifles is one of the most problematic issues related to the contributions of gangs, drug traffickers, and most criminal activity. Don’t you think Islamic State operatives might be smart enough to have Bibles in their carry-ons rather than Korans? If you need a well-written job in a short time, the team of professional essay writers of is just what you are looking for. Here's why people think assault rifles should be legal. Freedom is possible, however, without the right to buy military weapons designed for killing sprees. Assault Weapons: The roots of many murders and other shootings Assault Weapons: Killing Machines that have no reason to be in the hands of hunters or recreational shooters California's Senator Dianne Feinstein's proposed assault weapons ban bans 157 guns. If this ensconces me in an ideological corner, I’m fine with that. The half-life of military-style rifles ensures they’ll be with us for many generations. Charles Kaiser: Fellow gay people, don’t forget: We are a battle-hardened movement, Jonathan Capehart: A horrible day for Orlando, gay pride and U.S. history. While some people believe they are a danger to society, assault weapons should not be banned because it is a constitutional right, provides protection, and the ban failed many times in the past. No one I know in politics seriously proposes that ordinary Americans be denied the right to own those kinds of weapons. When the former President of Mexico visited the United States some time ago to discuss the drug-fueled violence on the Mexican border, he pointed out that the end of the assault weapons ban in the U.S. had resulted in an explosion of smuggling of assault weapons from the United States to Mexico. “Assault weapons — military-style firearms designed to fire rapidly — are a threat to our national security, and we should treat them as such,” Biden wrote in his weekend op-ed. And for those who believe assault rifles offer protection against a hypothetical tyrannical government — or who perhaps consider the present government tyrannical — I have sobering news: If and when the black helicopters come, they will be accompanied by tanks. Here's why people think assault rifles should be banned. This section said that according to the FBI Uniform Crime Reports in 2011, of the 8583 firearm homicides that occurred, 6220 were committed by handguns, and only 323 were committed by rifles. Our recent New York Times article provided important new empirical evidence that the federal assault weapons ban (AWB) – in place from 1994-2004 – was an important tool in the effort to reduce the death toll from public mass shootings. v. the 1994 federal assault weapons ban 692 vi. Criminals and murderers use assault weapons and semi-automatic weapons because they are readily available. The Second Amendment enshrines the right to keep and bear arms, and the Supreme Court has ruled that this is an individual right, not a collective one. Freedom is possible, however, without the right to buy military weapons designed for killing sprees. If Lanza had conventional guns -- or like a man in China who recently went berserk, he only had knives -- he would not have been physically capable of killing so many people in a few short minutes.